Equipment's are design to be save from danger in their normal operation.
My manager and I recently had an interesting discussion regarding the Asset Failure Curve (or PF, IPF, DIPF curve in certain circles, and is shown above the title of this article). Our discussion ended up in a place where we were making correlations between equipment reliability and human safety.
Below is the Heinrich Safety Triangle, which we've all seen if we've ever been part of an industrial organization that had a broad focus on human safety.
What would it look like to turn this pyramid into its own curve and overlay it into the DIPF curve? The graphic below shows exactly that.
So what does this show us? Many conclusions can be made here. A few key takeaways are shown below:
The probability of an injury is significantly increased with non-routine maintenance activity resulting from equipment failures.
Connecting the importance of human safety to the importance of equipment reliability is critical in driving an injury-free culture.
How have you or your organization connected equipment reliability to human safety? Is there data proving this? What methods are in place to continue to push the limits of equipment reliability while improving human safety hand-in-hand? I would like your opinion on this subject.
From Dustin M. Etchison, CMRP
On the off chance that crediting cash would pull away money related weight away, this sort of advance can without much of a stretch be the solution to your necessities.
ReplyDeleteThe way that there is an alternative at all is the thing that makes these credits positive. At times individuals simply require an open way to turn their accounts around and a payday credit does the trap.
ReplyDeleteIn the event that you can't stand to fork over the required funds, rub together as much as you can. This will bring down the intrigue expenses the following term around.
ReplyDeleteb6d18n4i36 k6i15f4c54 z0r62r3m41 t6b55f2p06 a6c60w5p75 a1r17r1d05
ReplyDelete